IMO Flexible to Accommodate New Technologies

International Maritime Organization (IMO) the global regulatory body for international shipping has expressed readiness to accommodate new technologies and thus ensure efficiency and safety of shipping.

IMO Secretary-General Kitack Lim while speaking at the 99^th session of the body said the organization while remaining flexible shall not lose sight of the role of the human element and the need to maintain safe navigation and further reduce the number of marine casualties and incidents”.

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) the global regulatory body for international shipping has commenced work to look into how safe, secure and environmentally sound Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) operations may be addressed its instruments.

Meanwhile, the Organization’s senior technical body, the Maritime Safety Committee (MSC), has endorsed a framework for a regulatory scoping exercise, as work in progress, including preliminary definitions of MASS and degrees of autonomy, as well as a methodology for conducting the exercise and a plan of work.

Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship is defined as a ship, which, to a varying degree, can operate independently of human interaction.

To facilitate the progress of the regulatory scoping exercise, the degrees of autonomy are categorised.

One, Ship with automated processes and decision support where Seafarers are on board to operate and control shipboard systems and functions. Some operations may be automated.

Two, remotely controlled ship with seafarers on board. Here, the ship is controlled and operated from another location, but seafarers are on board.

Three, remotely controlled ship without seafarers on board. The ship in this case, are without seafarers on board and is controlled and operated from another location.

Four, fully autonomous ship.in this case, the operating system of the ship is able to make decisions and determine actions by itself.

As a first step, the scoping exercise will identify current provisions in an agreed list of IMO instruments and assess how they may or may not be applicable to ships with varying degrees of autonomy and whether or not they may preclude MASS operations.

As a second step, an analysis will be conducted to determine the most appropriate way of addressing MASS operations, taking into account, inter alia, the human element, technology and operational factors.

The MSC, which was meeting for its 99th session established a correspondence group on MASS to test the framework of the regulatory scoping exercise agreed at the session and, in particular, the methodology, and report back to its next session, MSC 100 (3-7 December 2018).

The Correspondence Group will test the methodology by conducting an initial assessment of SOLAS regulation III/17-1 (Recovery of persons from the water), which requires all ships to have ship-specific plans and procedures for recovery of persons from the water; SOLAS regulation V/19.2 (Carriage requirements for carriage of shipborne navigational equipment and systems); and Load Lines regulation 10 (Information to be supplied to the master).

If time allows, it will also consider SOLAS regulations II-1/3-4 (Emergency towing arrangements and procedures) and V/22 (Navigation bridge visibility).

The Committee further invited interested Member States and international organizations to submit proposals related to the development of interim guidelines for MASS trials to its next session, MSC 100.