Customs & ExciseHeadlinesPorts Management

Closure of borders, exercise in futility – Freight Forwarders 

0

 Segun Oladipupo        

A group of freight forwarders under the aegis of the Association of Registered Freight Forwarders of Nigeria (AREFFN) has described the closing of land border across Nigeria as efforts in futility as it believes the measure would not achieve any result.

Recall that the federal government recently ordered partial closure of land borders across the four  political zones of the country.

The exercise code named Ex Swift is to be carried out by Nigeria Customs Service in collaboration with other sister security agencies.

In a statement in Lagos on Friday by Mr. Ejike Metu and Mr. Innocent Elum, Chairman and Secretary of the association’s Board of Trustees (BOT) respectively, recalled that the clarification on why the borders were partially closed was to come in faraway Japan recently when President Muhammadu Buhari, while in a meeting with his Benin Republic counterpart, President Patrice Talon  over the issue  disclosed that the Border closure was basically aimed at stemming the tide of rice smuggling into the country through the border post.

The statement observed that the action begs the question of why the staple foods have continued to find their way into the country illegally despite measures by government to contain the trend.

“We think that government should do a more thorough thinking to ascertain the fundamental causative factors and provide lasting solution”, it added.

The statement said,” AREFFN appreciates and commends the passion of the President Muhammadu Buhari-led administration in encouraging national self-reliance in rice production and general food security. We support and identify with government’s strategic policies and programmes geared towards achieving the laudable objective.

“Thus we condemn in strongest terms possible the nefarious activities of the smugglers capable of stymieing the government laudable policy and align with any credible actions government might take to rein in the economic saboteurs.

“However, we believe that closing the border just for some days is no silver bullet and cannot achieve any meaningful result. Indeed, the action begs the question of why the grains have continued to find their way into the country illegally despite measures by government to contain the trend. We think that government should do a more thorough thinking to ascertain the fundamental causative factors and provide lasting solution.”

On why rice smuggling had refused to stop, the statement read as follows; “The quantity produced locally at present is hardly sufficient to complement the imports and satisfy the demand of over 120 million Nigerians, not even with the smuggled ones. This explains its exorbitant price of between N17,000 and N18,000 before the border closure, and currently between N19,000 and N20,000 apparently beyond the reach of the poor.

“Instructively, the local ones appear nonexistent in the market and even if you are lucky to find it, it is almost the same price as the foreign one. We recommend that government adopts a gradualist approach in implementing the rice policy to avoid creating more problems than it seeks to solve.

“Ban on importation of automobiles through the land borders:  Our investigation has revealed that a good number of the rice smugglers are inhabitants of the border communities who hitherto engaged in legitimate clearing of used vehicles, with many of them graduates of many years standing but with no jobs. We recommend that government should revisit and reconsider the policy.

“Porousness of the land borders:  It is common knowledge that the nation’s land borders, from North through South are very porous with over 1,400 illegal and ineffectively manned routes and waterways.  Very often customs officials and the smugglers clash on these routes, sometimes with casualties on one or both sides. This is usually reported by the media.

“It requires no deep imagination, therefore, to understand that the smugglers carry out their illegal activities through the unapproved routes and certainly not the official border that plays host to heavy and ubiquitous security presence.  Importers and other legitimate trans-border traders are those you find here processing their documentations with Customs, Immigration, etc. We recommend that government draft more security personnel to man the unapproved  routes, but should also bear in mind that smuggling is a global phenomenon that can be checkmated but perhaps impossible to do away with totally all at once.”

The statement further recommended that government should in future engage freight forwarders or non-government actors operating at the borders for information, advice and proper guidance before taking certain actions to avoid mistakes.

© 2019, maritimemag. All rights reserved.

Kudos as Dakuku gives NIMASA head office new look.

Previous article

Knocks: Apapa and Tincan Customs “chop” alone as KLT  bleeds again

Next article

You may also like

Comments

Comments are closed.